This story was initially printed by Grist. Join Grist’s weekly newsletter here.
Over the previous a number of years, U.S. cities and states have handed a whole lot of insurance policies proscribing the sale and distribution of single-use plastic baggage. A new report says these legal guidelines have largely succeeded of their objective of decreasing plastic bag use. The report — copublished by three nonprofits, Surroundings America, U.S. Public Curiosity Analysis Group Schooling Fund, and Frontier Group — attracts on trade and authorities knowledge to recommend that plastic bag bans can get rid of almost 300 single-use plastic baggage per particular person per 12 months.
“The underside line is that plastic bag bans work,” mentioned Faye Park, president of the U.S. PIRG Schooling Fund, in a press release. “Folks notice shortly it’s simple to reside with out plastic baggage and get used to bringing a bag from dwelling or skipping a bag after they can.”
The report checked out plastic bag bans nationwide however centered on 5 consultant insurance policies in New Jersey; Vermont; Philadelphia; Portland, Oregon; and Santa Barbara, California. New Jersey’s, enacted in 2022, has had the best impression, eliminating greater than 5.5 billion plastic baggage yearly. Insurance policies within the different jurisdictions eradicated between about 45 million and 200 million plastic baggage per 12 months, relying on inhabitants dimension. The researchers arrived at their estimates utilizing knowledge collected by municipal companies, lecturers, and plastics and grocery trade teams.
In complete, there are greater than 500 citywide ordinances banning plastic baggage within the U.S., in addition to 12 statewide bans — in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai‘i, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. New payments might quickly add Georgia and Massachusetts to that checklist.
The case towards plastic baggage is straightforward. They trigger air pollution at each stage of their lifespan, beginning with the extraction of the oil and gasoline that’s used to make them. They can’t be recycled; after getting used simply as soon as — for a mean of about 12 minutes, in keeping with one estimate — they’re both incinerated or despatched to a landfill, the place they’ll final for a whole lot of years.
Notoriously, baggage can even develop into litter that pollutes the pure setting and kills wildlife. Plastic baggage, alongside plastic movies, trigger more deaths of sea turtles, whales, dolphins, and porpoises than some other form of plastic. They’ll additionally shed tiny fragments referred to as microplastics, publicity to which can be linked to metabolic disorder, neurotoxicity, and reproductive damage in people, amongst different well being issues.
“It looks like there’s a research every week exhibiting that plastics aren’t simply littering and polluting the setting, however digging into our bloodstream,” mentioned Janet Domenitz, govt director of the nonprofit MassPIRG, the Massachusetts department of the Public Curiosity Analysis Group. Plus, microplastics release greenhouse gases that contribute to local weather change.
Plastic bag bans have their skeptics, nonetheless, together with those that imagine it’s “narcissistic” to assist them whereas nonetheless partaking in different environmentally damaging practices, like driving a gasoline-powered automobile. Others have argued that plastic bag bans are bad for businesses, or that they violate consumers’ freedom to decide on plastic. As of 2021, 18 states had handed so-called preemption legal guidelines, stopping native governments from adopting their very own bag bans.
Some researchers have counterintuitively concluded that plastic baggage are good for the setting, in comparison with paper or canvas options. One viral study from 2018 claimed {that a} cotton bag must be reused 20,000 occasions to offset the environmental impression of manufacturing it, whereas different research have criticized plastic bag bans for resulting in a spike in using paper baggage — which additionally expend assets. Analysis exhibits that paper baggage take more energy and water to provide than plastic baggage.
Different consultants, nonetheless, say the cotton bag research makes a “false comparison” between reusable and plastic baggage, failing to account for the total life cycle impacts of plastic as soon as it’s disposed of or littered into the setting. As for the plastic or paper debate, environmental teams agree that the purpose of a “well-designed” plastic bag ban needs to be to cut back disposable bag use of any form.
“The intent of those legal guidelines isn’t to shift from a single-use bag to a different single-use bag,” Celeste Meiffren-Swango, Surroundings America Analysis and Coverage Middle’s Past Plastic marketing campaign director and a coauthor of the brand new report, informed Grist. “Paper has its personal environmental impression.” She advisable that each one plastic bag bans embrace a 10-cent cost for paper baggage to encourage prospects to carry reusable options.
The report additionally urged policymakers to ban plastic baggage of any form — not simply skinny ones. In some jurisdictions, it recognized a “loophole” that has allowed grocery shops and different retailers to interchange skinny single-use plastic baggage with thicker ones which can be nominally reusable — despite the fact that analysis suggests that buyers don’t reuse the thicker baggage in apply. In California, this loophole led to a web improve within the weight of plastic baggage used per particular person between 2004 and 2021.
This text initially appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/solutions/plastic-bag-bans-have-already-prevented-billions-of-bags-from-being-used-report-finds/. Grist is a nonprofit, impartial media group devoted to telling tales of local weather options and a simply future. Be taught extra at Grist.org